From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McKane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1995
222 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 4, 1995

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that the court violated the terms of the plea agreement by imposing a fine in the amount of $1,000 (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Molini, 219 A.D.2d 780).

The defendant's additional claim, that the County Court erred in denying his motions pursuant to CPL 440.20 and 440.10 Crim. Proc., is not properly before this Court, inasmuch as he did not obtain leave to appeal from the denial of the motions (see, CPL 450.15; People v. Kihm, 143 A.D.2d 199; People v. Gaines, 212 A.D.2d 727). Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McKane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1995
222 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. McKane

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT McKANE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 4, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
634 N.Y.S.2d 542

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Defendant now appeals claiming that County Court violated the terms of the plea agreement by imposing a…

People v. Warren

The defendant's claim that the County Court erred in summarily denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to…