From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mcfarland

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 20, 2011
88 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-20

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Elias McFARLAND, Defendant–Appellant.


Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Lorca Morello of counsel), for appellant.Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ryan Gee of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. Conviser, J.), entered on or about October 25, 2010, which denied defendant's CPL 440.20 motion to set aside a sentence of the same court (James A. Yates, J.), imposed February 21, 2003, unanimously affirmed.

Instead of postrelease supervision, the sentencing court used the phrase “supervised parole for five years” and stated that this was “part of the sentence too.” While the court misspoke, the nomenclature it used was sufficiently similar to the correct term that there could not have been any ambiguity or misunderstanding ( cf. People v. Carter, 67 A.D.3d 603, 604, 889 N.Y.S.2d 181 [2009], lv. denied 14 N.Y.3d 886, 903 N.Y.S.2d 774, 929 N.E.2d 1009 [2010] [plea not rendered involuntary by misuse of parole to mean PRS] ). Accordingly, there was no violation of defendant's “right to hear the court's pronouncement as to what the entire sentence encompasses, directly from the court” ( People v. Sparber, 10 N.Y.3d 457, 470, 859 N.Y.S.2d 582, 889 N.E.2d 459 [2008] ).

GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, SWEENY, ABDUS–SALAAM, ROMÁN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mcfarland

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 20, 2011
88 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Mcfarland

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Elias McFARLAND…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7346
931 N.Y.S.2d 225

Citing Cases

People v. Waterbury

The Board's commentary on its guidelines "recognizes 'that an objective instrument, no matter how well…

People v. Melchiorre

D. Ongoing examination and proposed changes to the RAI The RAI was first distributed for use in January of…