From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McDowell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 27, 1999
264 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 11, 1999

September 27, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered May 21, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Carol Siegel, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Camille O'Hara Gillespie of counsel), for respondent.

SONDRA MILLER, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that he is entitled to a new trial because the People failed to provide him with notice, pursuant to Penal Law § 450.10, that the complainant's stolen telephone calling card, recovered from the defendant upon his arrest, was returned to the complainant prior to trial. Absent prejudice or a showing that the statutory violation was intentional or in bad faith, reversal is not warranted ( see, People v. Watkins, 239 A.D.2d 448; People v. Siriani, 216 A.D.2d 595; People v. Dent, 183 A.D.2d 723).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

S. MILLER, J.P., O'BRIEN, FRIEDMANN, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McDowell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 27, 1999
264 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. ANTHONY McDOWELL, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 465

Citing Cases

People v. Pearsall

While "the degree of prosecutorial fault . . . may be considered, . . . the overriding concern must be to…

People v. Wedlington

In fact, the record establishes that the only relief defendant requested was that the cash stolen from the…