Opinion
2022-00752
02-04-2022
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. CHRISTOPHER E. MCCREA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. DONALD G. O'GEEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WARSAW (VINCENT A. HEMMING OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
DONALD G. O'GEEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WARSAW (VINCENT A. HEMMING OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Michael M. Mohun, J.), rendered July 11, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant upon a jury verdict of assault in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]), defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction inasmuch as the People failed to establish that he intended to prevent a police officer from performing a lawful duty. Defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review because his motion for a trial order of dismissal was not specifically directed at the ground advanced on appeal (see People v Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19 [1995]; People v Townsley, 50 A.D.3d 1610, 1611 [4th Dept 2008], lv denied 11 N.Y.3d 742 [2008]). In any event, we conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction and, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349 [2007]), we reject defendant's further contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495 [1987]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.