From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McCray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 5, 2001
284 A.D.2d 111 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

June 5, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J.), rendered April 14, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, 7 years and 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

Sheryl Feldman, for respondent.

Terence J. Sweeney, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach, Marlow, JJ.


The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility were properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its findings. The credible evidence clearly established defendant's homicidal intent and disproved his justification defense.

The court appropriately exercised its discretion in denying defendant's last-minute request, after the prosecution had finished its case, for a continuance to attempt to produce a potential witness. Defendant failed to show that he could be produced within a reasonable time (see, Matter of Anthony M., 63 N.Y.2d 270, 283-284; People v. Covington, 233 A.D.2d 169,lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 941).


Summaries of

People v. McCray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 5, 2001
284 A.D.2d 111 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. McCray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD McCRAY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 5, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 111 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 546

Citing Cases

McCray v. Bennet

On appeal to the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court, First Department, petitioner argued…

People v. Moore

We further reject the contention of defendant that the court erred in denying his request for an adjournment…