In People v. McConnell (19 A.D.2d 777, affd. 14 N.Y.2d 525) it was held that confessions obtained by the police between arrest and arraignment, in the absence of defendant's retained counsel who had not been prevented from conferring with defendant at the time the confessions were made, were properly admitted in evidence.
Summary of this case from People v. GunnerDecided July 1, 1963
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
In People v. McConnell (19 A.D.2d 777, affd. 14 N.Y.2d 525) it was held that confessions obtained by the police between arrest and arraignment, in the absence of defendant's retained counsel who had not been prevented from conferring with defendant at the time the confessions were made, were properly admitted in evidence.
Summary of this case from People v. GunnerFull title:PEOPLE v. McCONNELL (JOHN) — (GB, PK, MC, LH, SR)
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jul 1, 1963
63, 64, and the oral statement taken on the plane on July 21, 1962) were also properly admitted. In People v.…