From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McClinton

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 29, 2019
934 N.W.2d 263 (Mich. 2019)

Opinion

SC: 160106 COA: 348817

10-29-2019

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Annessa Marnet MCCLINTON, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for amendment of the Presentence Investigation Report. The defendant challenged a juvenile adjudication in the Presentence Investigation Report at sentencing and in a motion to correct her sentence. At the motion hearing, the sentencing judge stated on the record that he did not take the challenged information into account in sentencing, but he did not direct the probation officer to correct or delete the information from the Presentence Investigation Report as required by MCR 6.425(E)(2)(a). We further ORDER the circuit court to ensure that the amended Presentence Investigation Report is transmitted to the Department of Corrections. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

People v. McClinton

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 29, 2019
934 N.W.2d 263 (Mich. 2019)
Case details for

People v. McClinton

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANNESSA MARNET…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Oct 29, 2019

Citations

934 N.W.2d 263 (Mich. 2019)