Opinion
May, 1906.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered. Held, that the reception of evidence of sales of liquor other than that charged in the indictment was improper and constituted reversible error. All concurred.
May, 1906.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered. Held, that the reception of evidence of sales of liquor other than that charged in the indictment was improper and constituted reversible error. All concurred.
Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward McAllister…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 1, 1906