From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McAllister

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 1, 2012
98 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-08-1

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Owen Q. McALLISTER, appellant.

Kenneth Lyle Bunting, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Jennifer Spencer, Steven A. Bender, and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.


Kenneth Lyle Bunting, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Jennifer Spencer, Steven A. Bender, and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wetzel, J.), rendered March 15, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's generalized motion to dismiss, made at the conclusion of the People's case, failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction of burglary in the second degree ( see People v. Hawkins, 11 N.Y.3d 484, 492, 872 N.Y.S.2d 395, 900 N.E.2d 946). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt with respect to the conviction of burglary in the second degree. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence ( seeCPL 470.15[5]; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt with respect to the conviction of burglary in the second degree was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 644–645, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.

ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON, BELEN and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McAllister

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 1, 2012
98 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. McAllister

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Owen Q. McALLISTER, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 1, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5837
948 N.Y.S.2d 913

Citing Cases

People v. Brown

of rhetorical comment permissible in closing arguments, were fairly responsive to arguments and issues…