From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mazyck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 1993
194 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 28, 1993

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that his plea should be vacated on the ground that it was not knowing and voluntary (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662). In any event, the record reveals that the defendant's guilty plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. The defendant's claim that he was deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v. Moss, 188 A.D.2d 620). Appellate review of the remaining issues raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his negotiated plea. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed (see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1). Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mazyck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 1993
194 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Mazyck

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT MAZYCK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
599 N.Y.S.2d 1021

Citing Cases

People v. Marshall

They involve the court's statutory powers and the lawfulness of the sentence imposed ( see also, People v.…

People v. Davis

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that he was deprived of his…