From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mayo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-15

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Matthew J. MAYO, Also Known as Meyhem, Appellant.

Frank A. Sarat, Homer, for appellant. Gerald F. Mollen, District Attorney, Binghamton (Joann Rose Parry of counsel), for respondent.



Frank A. Sarat, Homer, for appellant. Gerald F. Mollen, District Attorney, Binghamton (Joann Rose Parry of counsel), for respondent.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, LAHTINEN, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ.

McCARTHY, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered January 12, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

Following an incident in which defendant fatally stabbed a man outside a bar, he was charged in an indictment with a number of crimes, including murder in the second degree. He pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the first degree in satisfaction of the indictment as well as an unrelated assault charge arising from his attack upon a correction officer while he was in custody. Defendant was sentenced, in accordance with the plea agreement, to 20 years in prison, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. He now appeals.

Defendant contends that his sentence is harsh and excessive. Based upon our review of the record, we disagree. Defendant has a lengthy criminal record starting from a very young age. He has exhibited violent propensities, as is evidenced by both the crime at issue and his attack upon the correction officer, but has not shown remorse for his actions. In view of this, as well as the fact that he received the sentence promised under the terms of the plea agreement, we find no extraordinary circumstances or any abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice ( see People v. Gillespie, 45 A.D.3d 974, 845 N.Y.S.2d 177 [2007];see also People v. Sullivan, 37 A.D.3d 974, 975, 829 N.Y.S.2d 761 [2007],lv. denied8 N.Y.3d 991, 838 N.Y.S.2d 494, 869 N.E.2d 670 [2007] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, LAHTINEN and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mayo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Mayo

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Matthew J. MAYO, Also…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 15, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 1155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
955 N.Y.S.2d 219
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7723

Citing Cases

People v. Shan

Significantly, he faced an aggregate term of up to 32 years in prison if convicted of the crimes alleged in…

People v. Jarvis

Defendant appeals. Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that his sentence is harsh and excessive—a claim…