From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maybell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1993
198 A.D.2d 108 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 16, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Andrias, J.).


The on the street showup identification of defendant approximately 3 hours after commission of the crime was not, in the present circumstances, unduly suggestive (People v Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541). Officers on routine patrol came upon an angry crowd holding defendant. After speaking with members of the crowd, the officers asked the crowd to release defendant and to bring the victim, a frail 78 year old woman, to the area which was 2 blocks from the crime scene. Moments later, the victim arrived, and without any assistance from the officers or the others, identified defendant who was standing, uncuffed, on the sidewalk, unrestrained by the crowd which had now dispersed.

Suppression of defendant's statement, made following the showup and upon his arrest, was properly denied since the statement was spontaneous and not the product of interrogation.

The court properly discharged the unsworn juror. Her conduct raised serious questions about her truthfulness and fitness and the court properly took into account that the trial was anticipated to only last one day (Judiciary Law § 517 [c]).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Maybell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1993
198 A.D.2d 108 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Maybell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD MAYBELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 108 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 161

Citing Cases

People v. Woods

Defendant was identified at the crime scene by the store clerk approximately one hour and 20 minutes after…

People v. Wells

Defendant failed to preserve his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence ( People v Gray, 86…