Opinion
December 10, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant engaged in deviant sexual intercourse, by forcible compulsion, with another person less than 11 years of age (see, Penal Law § 130.50). Clearly this conduct endangered the welfare of that victim and his young companion (see, Penal Law § 260.10).
Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). Minor inconsistencies in the testimony of two young boys present questions of credibility and the weight to be accorded such testimony (see, People v. Di Girolamo, 108 A.D.2d 755; People v. Williams, 123 A.D.2d 897). Resolution of issues of credibility as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86, 88; People v. Akgun, 139 A.D.2d 654). We find that the court's determination was supported by the record. Lawrence, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.