From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maultsby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1991
172 A.D.2d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 29, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his conviction of robbery in the first degree (see, Penal Law § 160.15) is unpreserved for appellate review as he failed to raise an objection at trial on the specific ground which he presently asserts (see, People v. Colavito, 70 N.Y.2d 996; People v. Bynum, 70 N.Y.2d 858). Moreover, we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction under the circumstances presented in this case.

We find the sentence imposed upon the defendant to be neither unduly harsh nor excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Maultsby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1991
172 A.D.2d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Maultsby

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD MAULTSBY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)