Opinion
April 29, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his conviction of robbery in the first degree (see, Penal Law § 160.15) is unpreserved for appellate review as he failed to raise an objection at trial on the specific ground which he presently asserts (see, People v. Colavito, 70 N.Y.2d 996; People v. Bynum, 70 N.Y.2d 858). Moreover, we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction under the circumstances presented in this case.
We find the sentence imposed upon the defendant to be neither unduly harsh nor excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.