From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Matos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 21, 1992
186 A.D.2d 228 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

September 21, 1992

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Sherman, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, Eiber, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Matos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 21, 1992
186 A.D.2d 228 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Matos

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS MATOS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 21, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 228 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
587 N.Y.S.2d 772