From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Matos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1989
151 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 5, 1989

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Any issue of law with respect to the defendant's argument that the sentence imposed on him was so disproportionate to his offense as to violate constitutional limitations (see, US Const 8th Amend; N Y Const, art I, § 5; see generally, People v Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, cert denied 423 U.S. 950) has not been preserved for appellate review (see, e.g., People v. Mateo, 144 A.D.2d 388). In any event, the contention is without merit. The sentence imposed was the minimum sentence for a second felony offender and appropriate under all the circumstances of this case. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Matos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1989
151 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Matos

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAUL MATOS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

People v. Garcia

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant's argument that the sentence imposed on him was so harsh…