From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mathis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 19, 2017
61 N.Y.S.3d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-19-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Malik MATHIS, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Epstein of Counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alexander Michaels of Counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Epstein of Counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alexander Michaels of Counsel), for respondent.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

ACOSTA, P.J., FRIEDMAN, WEBBER, OING, and MOULTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mathis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 19, 2017
61 N.Y.S.3d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Mathis

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Malik MATHIS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 19, 2017

Citations

61 N.Y.S.3d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)