From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mateo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 1992
188 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 29, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (James Leff, J.).


The court properly instructed the jury that defendant's common-law wife was a missing witness (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424, 427), the defense having failed to meet his burden of showing that her testimony would be cumulative to that of his other alibi witnesses (see, People v Fields, 76 N.Y.2d 761, 763). The court's charge fairly tracked the preferable instructions set forth in People v Paylor ( 70 N.Y.2d 146, 149), and the inclusion of "the strongest adverse inference" language, which should be avoided, does not, in the circumstances of this case, in light of the overwhelming evidence, warrant reversal.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Mateo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 1992
188 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Mateo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MODESTO MATEO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 1012