From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mateo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 26, 2001
282 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

April 26, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered April 22, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

Floyd R. Engelhardt, for Respondent.

Rudolph J. Baron, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Williams, J.P., Tom, Wallach, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.


The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning identification and credibility.

Defendant's challenge to the chain of custody of the drugs sold to the undercover officer is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the evidence provided reasonable assurances of the identity and unchanged condition of the drugs, and that there was no evidence to the contrary (see, People v. Julian, 41 N.Y.2d 340). For the same reasons, defendant was not deprived of meaningful representation by the fact that defense counsel did not raise a chain of custody issue (see, People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Mateo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 26, 2001
282 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Mateo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT v. DAVID MATEO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 26, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 663

Citing Cases

People v. Gibson

The defendant's contention that certain testimony presented at trial was inconsistent with testimony…

People v. Gales

In any event, in denying defendant's Batson challenge the court implicitly determined that the prosecutor's…