From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mateen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 12, 2020
181 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

11274 Ind. 1343/16

03-12-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jamal MATEEN, Defendant–Appellant.

Christina Swarns, Office of The Appellate Defender, New York (Emma L. Shreefter of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jonathon Krois of counsel), for respondent.


Christina Swarns, Office of The Appellate Defender, New York (Emma L. Shreefter of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jonathon Krois of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Oing, Gonzlez, JJ.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Mateen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 12, 2020
181 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Mateen

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jamal Mateen…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 12, 2020

Citations

181 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 1721
117 N.Y.S.3d 839