Opinion
March 4, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that a Trowbridge error was committed when a photograph of the lineup viewed by the complainant was received into evidence is without merit (see, People v Rawlings, 144 A.D.2d 500). The defendant's other claims of improper bolstering are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Brown, 161 A.D.2d 777).
The defendant also contends that the prosecutor made improper comments during the course of summation and that the court's charge was erroneous in several respects. None of these purported errors was objected to at trial and therefore these issues are not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05). We decline to reach the defendant's claims in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Kunzeman, J.P., Kooper, Harwood and O'Brien, JJ., concur.