From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Massie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2003
305 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1000

May 1, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), rendered February 22, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

Sylvia Wertheimer, for respondent.

Jonathan M. Kirshbaum, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger, Friedman, JJ.


The court properly ruled that defendant's proposed inquiry into a pretrial photographic identification would open the door to testimony regarding untainted and attenuated lineup identifications that had been suppressed solely on right to counsel grounds ( see People v. Melendez, 55 N.Y.2d 445). Defendant sought to establish that the witnesses' in-court identifications were the product of an allegedly suggestive photo identification. Accordingly, the People were entitled to introduce a lineup identification, conducted several months later, that was free of the photo identification's alleged defects. Otherwise, defendant's proposed inquiry would have created misleading impressions (see People v. Mahone, 206 A.D.2d 263, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 869). In any event, defendant has not established that the photo identification was critical to his defense or that his inability to introduce it without opening the door to the lineup deprived him of a fair trial.

Although some of the prosecutor's summation comments could be perceived as vouching for the credibility of the witnesses, even if improper, they did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884). Defendant's remaining challenges to the prosecutor's summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find the challenged remarks to be fair comment on the evidence in response to the defense summation (see People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Massie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2003
305 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Massie

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMAL MASSIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 742

Citing Cases

People v. Massie

The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), which…

People v. Woojin Cho

In any event, the court's curative instructions were sufficient to prevent any prejudice (see People v…