Opinion
March 1, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Albert Williams, J.
There is no merit to defendant's unpreserved claim that the Supreme Court "erred by promising that the federal parole violation sentence would run currently with the other sentences." The plea minutes make clear that no such promise was made. Rather, the court merely agreed to "recommend" that any Federal sentence to be imposed for defendant's parole violation should run concurrently with the State sentence, a recommendation the court did in fact make at sentencing.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Asch, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.