From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martorana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 18, 1992

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Connell, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of manslaughter after a nonjury trial at which he testified. A Sandoval hearing was held in chambers in defendant's absence and the court's ruling that defendant could be cross-examined on a disorderly conduct conviction was put on the record before he testified. There was no objection to that procedure. We find that defendant's presence at the Sandoval hearing would have been superfluous and that reversal is not required on these facts (see, People v Dokes, 79 N.Y.2d 656, 662). The court did not err in allowing the prosecutor to impeach defendant with his prior statement with respect to which no CPL 710.30 notice was served (see, People v Mitchell, 155 A.D.2d 879, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 739). Defendant's sentence was neither harsh nor excessive.


Summaries of

People v. Martorana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Martorana

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAM MARTORANA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Kirkland

Defendant's absence from the in-chambers Sandoval hearing violated his constitutional and statutory right to…