Opinion
February 7, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (George, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that certain statements that he allegedly made to law enforcement officials were taken in violation of his Miranda rights is not reviewable on this appeal (see, People v. Fernandez, 67 N.Y.2d 686; People v. Lewis, 140 A.D.2d 630; see also, People v. Corti, 88 A.D.2d 345).
The sentence imposed is not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se brief, and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.