Opinion
October 7, 1992
Appeal from the Jefferson County Court, Clary, J.
Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant's contention that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements made to the police. Great weight must be accorded the suppression court's determinations that the statements were voluntary (see, People v Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761). The factual determinations are supported by the record (see, People v Hoyer, 140 A.D.2d 853, 854, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 919). We also find that defendant's sentence was neither harsh nor excessive.