From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martinez

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jan 24, 2020
66 Misc. 3d 139 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)

Opinion

2016-2494 RI CR

01-24-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rigoberto Luis MARTINEZ, Appellant.

Appellate Advocates (Meredith S. Holt of counsel), for appellant. Richmond County District Attorney (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent.


Appellate Advocates (Meredith S. Holt of counsel), for appellant.

Richmond County District Attorney (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: MICHELLE WESTON, J.P., DAVID ELLIOT, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; People v. Murray , 169 AD3d 227 [2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

WESTON, J.P., ELLIOT and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Martinez

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jan 24, 2020
66 Misc. 3d 139 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
Case details for

People v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rigoberto Luis…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Jan 24, 2020

Citations

66 Misc. 3d 139 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 50092
120 N.Y.S.3d 703