From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martinez

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
Apr 26, 2016
H042856 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 26, 2016)

Opinion

H042856

04-26-2016

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTONIO MIRANDA MARTINEZ, Defendant and Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Monterey County Super. Ct. No. SS150148)

Defendant Antonio Miranda Martinez appeals from an order to pay restitution to the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (Board). On appeal, defendant's appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.

Background

A jury found defendant guilty of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)) and found true the allegation that he personally discharged a firearm causing death (§ 12022.53, subd. (d)). In June 2015, the trial court sentenced defendant to a prison term of 50 years to life. The court retained jurisdiction for purposes of restitution, observing that a claim for restitution had been submitted by the Board.

All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated. --------

In July, 2015, the prosecution filed a memorandum of points and authorities in support of a restitution award of $4,986.60, which represented the amount the Board had paid to the victim's family for burial expenses. The prosecution also submitted documents from the Board, including statements under penalty of perjury from the Board's custodian of records, showing that the victim's family had been billed $5,161.60 for "Funeral Burial," and that the Board had allowed and paid $4,986.60.

A restitution hearing was held on August 20, 2015. Defendant refused to stipulate to the victim restitution payable to the Board, but presented no evidence in opposition. The trial court ordered that defendant pay restitution in the amount of $4,986.60 to the Board.

This Appeal

Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal from the restitution order and we appointed counsel to represent him in this court. Appointed counsel has filed a brief in this court which states the case and facts but which raises no issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. That period has elapsed and we have received no response from defendant. Pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.

DISPOSITION

The trial court's order of August 20, 2015, is affirmed.

/s/_________

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J. WE CONCUR: /s/_________

ELIA, ACTING P.J. /s/_________

MIHARA, J.


Summaries of

People v. Martinez

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
Apr 26, 2016
H042856 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 26, 2016)
Case details for

People v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTONIO MIRANDA MARTINEZ…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 26, 2016

Citations

H042856 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 26, 2016)