From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 1997
243 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 27, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.)


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was prejudiced as a result of the court's jury instructions on the issue of justification is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to object to the charge as delivered, or to request supplemental instructions ( see, People v. Riley, 200 A.D.2d 692; People v. Noor, 177 A.D.2d 517). In any event, the court's charge, viewed in its entirety, adequately conveyed the appropriate standard to the jury ( see, People v. Wesley, 76 N.Y.2d 555; People v. Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96; People v. Ball, 222 A.D.2d 598; People v. Davis, 218 A.D.2d 748).

Copertino, J.P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 1997
243 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE MARTINEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 528

Citing Cases

People v. Lee Battle

Since the defendant failed to object to the trial court's justification charge or to request supplemental…

People v. Wright

05; People vBrooks , 71 AD3d 1043, 1043; People v Peterkin , 23 AD3d 678, 678; People v Moultrie , 6 AD3d…