From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 11, 1992
184 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 11, 1992

Appeal from the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.).


We reject defendant's contention that the prison sentence he received as a second felony offender of 1 3/4 to 3 1/2 years was harsh and excessive. As a second felony offender, a prison term was mandatory and the most lenient sentence which could have been imposed was 1 1/2 to 3 years (Penal Law § 70.06 [e]; [4] [b]). At the time he entered his plea, it was specifically stated that no agreement on sentencing had been made and County Court informed defendant that he could receive a prison term of 2 to 4 years. Under these circumstances, coupled with the fact that the plea was to a reduced charge, we find no abuse of discretion by County Court in imposing sentence (see, People v. Dean, 155 A.D.2d 774, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 812; People v. Henao, 149 A.D.2d 531).

Weiss, P.J., Levine, Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 11, 1992
184 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELIAS J. MARTINEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 11, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Clark

Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed, which was the most…