holding that a defendant may not collaterally attack an order of protection in a criminal contempt prosecution
Summary of this case from People v. PanettaNo. 06 CR-2963.
March 8, 2007.
Contempt — Criminal Contempt — Validity of Underlying Order.
holding that a defendant may not collaterally attack an order of protection in a criminal contempt prosecution
Summary of this case from People v. PanettaFull title:People v. Martin (David)
Court:Justice Court. Hastings-on-Hudson, Westchester County
Date published: Mar 8, 2007
Id. at 913. But see People v Martin, 15 Misc 3d 1101(A) (Village Ct, Hastings-On-Hudson, 2007) (holding that…
People v. PanettaThe criminal contempt charge was dismissed at trial for the prosecution's failure to establish a prima facie…