Opinion
October 15, 1985
Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
The trial court properly found that the police conduct was not suggestive during the pretrial photographic and corporeal identification procedures. Consequently, there was no error in permitting Mr. Pinguelo to identify defendant at trial (see, People v Wilson, 107 A.D.2d 945, 947). In any event, under the circumstances, the objection made a day later after two more witnesses had testified did not preserve the alleged error in permitting the identification by Mr. Pinguelo.
Most of defendant's remaining contentions have not been preserved for review (see, People v Herbert, 100 A.D.2d 883). Those that were preserved have been considered and found to be without merit. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.