From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martin

Court of Appeal of California, First District
May 13, 1918
37 Cal.App. 213 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)

Opinion

Crim. No. 710.

May 13, 1918.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Cabaniss, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

James W. Cochrane, for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and John H. Riordan, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


In this case the appellant failed to file a brief in support of his appeal, or to appear before the court on the date set for the argument thereof, and the appeal might properly have been dismissed upon that ground. We have, however, carefully examined the record, and find that there was sufficient evidence to support the judgment, that the court fairly instructed the jury, and that there were no errors in the admission or rejection of evidence.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment and order be affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Martin

Court of Appeal of California, First District
May 13, 1918
37 Cal.App. 213 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
Case details for

People v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. EDWARD MARTIN, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District

Date published: May 13, 1918

Citations

37 Cal.App. 213 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
174 P. 91