From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 6, 1989

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant's contention that his guilty plea to the lesser crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance was not voluntarily and knowingly made because of his unfamiliarity with the English language is without merit in view of the fact that the plea minutes indicate that an interpreter was present and assisted defendant throughout the entire proceeding (see, People v Quezada, 145 A.D.2d 950, 951; People v Herrera, 107 A.D.2d 1040). The record establishes that defendant's guilty plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered (see, People v Francis, 38 N.Y.2d 150; People v Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 353, cert denied sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 U.S. 1067).


Summaries of

People v. Martes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Martes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MAXIMO MARTES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
545 N.Y.S.2d 885

Citing Cases

People v. Rosa-Sanchez

Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of defendant to vacate his plea…

People v. Mohammed

Our review of the record reveals that defendant's plea was "`a voluntary and intelligent choice among * * *…