From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marshall

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 6, 2013
104 A.D.3d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-6

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kalvin MARSHALL, appellant.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Laura Boyd of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Joyce Slevin, and Maria Park of counsel), for respondent.


Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Laura Boyd of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Joyce Slevin, and Maria Park of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), imposed May 31, 2011, on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

The resentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

ENG, P.J., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Marshall

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 6, 2013
104 A.D.3d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kalvin MARSHALL, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1428
960 N.Y.S.2d 321