From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 2002
300 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2513

December 10, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered July 23, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Christopher Wilson, for respondent.

Howard D. Simmons, for defendant-appellant.

Before: NARDELLI, J.P., TOM, MAZZARELLI, BUCKLEY, ELLERIN, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's accessorial liability was established by the totality of the conduct of defendant and his codefendant. This included evidence that defendant screened the undercover buyer, and after approving him as a customer, directed him to pay the codefendant, directed the codefendant to go upstairs for the obvious purpose of obtaining drugs, permitted the codefendant to pass through a secured door, and directed the undercover buyer to wait outside (see People v. Bello, 92 N.Y.2d 523).

Defendant's challenge to police testimony regarding the roles of participants in street narcotics sales is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the testimony, which was accompanied by limiting instructions, did not exceed appropriate limits or usurp the jury's fact-finding function (see People v. Brown, 97 N.Y.2d 500, 506-507;People v. Lacey, 245 A.D.2d 145, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 927).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Marquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 2002
300 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Marquez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. HARRY MARQUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 190

Citing Cases

PEOPLE v. ROSA

The defendant's conduct clearly does not rise to the level of a "steerer" or "screener" for the sale since he…

People v. Hatchett

(People v Bello, supra at 527.) Similarly, in People v Marquez (300 AD2d 83 [1st Dept 2002]), accomplice…