From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marnell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 14, 1984
106 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 14, 1984

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Hancock, Jr., Denman, Boomer and O'Donnell, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On defendant's appeal from the judgment of conviction, we have examined all issues preserved for review and find them to be without merit. Any claimed deficiency in the plea allocution was not timely raised at County Court "by motion to vacate or otherwise" and thus is not preserved for review ( People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636, 637; cf. People v. Sobczak, 105 A.D.2d 1053). Were we to undertake review, we would hold on this record that defendant's claim is without merit.

We note, however, that subsequent to the imposition of sentence, defendant moved pursuant to CPL 440.10 and 440.20 Crim. Proc. to set aside the judgment of conviction. There is no appeal before us from County Court's order denying that motion.


Summaries of

People v. Marnell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 14, 1984
106 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Marnell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HOWARD MARNELL, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Tobie

Defendant did not move, prior to sentencing, to withdraw his plea, nor did he move to vacate the judgment.…

Marnell v. Connell

The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, affirmed the conviction, and the New York Court of Appeals denied…