From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marletti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1984
106 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 3, 1984

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The stop of the automobile defendant was driving, along with the seizure of the gun which was in open view, was reasonable and proper ( People v. Singleton, 50 A.D.2d 939, affd 41 N.Y.2d 402). Moreover, the statements defendant made were in response to legitimate, on-the-scene questioning and were not the product of custodial interrogation and thus were properly admitted into evidence ( Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 477-478). Defendant's other contentions are either unpreserved or without merit. Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Marletti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1984
106 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Marletti

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT MARLETTI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Kleeman

It cannot be legitimately argued that the defendants were themselves the targets of a criminal investigation…