From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mark Burgess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 2011
81 A.D.3d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-01811.

February 22, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kase, J.), rendered January 22, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Richard J. Barbuto, Babylon, N.Y., for appellant.

Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Yael V. Levy and Richard R. Martell of counsel), for respondent.

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Román, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made ( see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16-17). The defendant's assertion that his plea was pressured or coerced is belied by the record ( see People v Scott, 77 AD3d 689, 689; People v Aguayo, 73 AD3d 938, 939; People v Mirecki, 63 AD3d 1089).

We find the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was not valid. However, "`[b]y pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited . . . his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel which do not directly involve the bargaining process'" ( People v Perazzo, 65 AD3d 1058, 1059, quoting People v Russell, 58 AD3d 759, 760; see People v DeLuca, 45 AD3d 777; People v Turner, 40 AD3d 1018, 1019). Moreover, "[t]o the extent that the defendant's claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel involves matter dehors the record, it cannot be reviewed on direct appeal" ( People v Bermejo, 77 AD3d 965, 966; see People v Kent, 79 AD3d 52, 72; People v Tillman, 74 AD3d 1251; People v Surin, 70 AD3d 731, 732). Insofar as the defendant's claim may properly be reviewed, the record reveals that defense counsel provided effective assistance ( see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712).


Summaries of

People v. Mark Burgess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 2011
81 A.D.3d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Mark Burgess

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK BURGESS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 2011

Citations

81 A.D.3d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1486
917 N.Y.S.2d 881

Citing Cases

People v. Yarborough

The record supports the Supreme Court's determination that the defendant's plea was entered knowingly,…

People v. Yarborough

The record supports the Supreme Court's determination that the defendant's plea was entered knowingly,…