From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marinus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 13, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict is not. against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's contention that the People failed to disprove his alibi defense beyond a reasonable doubt is not preserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Santos, 86 N.Y.2d 869; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10; People v. Coleman, 225 A.D.2d 705). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit. The People disproved the defendant's alibi by proving their own case beyond a reasonable doubt ( see, People v. O'Neill, 79 A.D.2d 429).

Pizzuto, J. P., Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Marinus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Marinus

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES MARINUS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 532

Citing Cases

People v. Sebastian Delamota

Accordingly, under the circumstances present here, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its…

People v. McCall

In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60…