From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marino

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York, Second Dept., 9 & 10 Jud. Dist.
Apr 21, 2022
75 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2022)

Opinion

2020-595 S CR

04-21-2022

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andrew MARINO, Appellant.

Brian J. Davis, for appellant. Suffolk County Traffic Prosecutor's Office, Justin W. Smiloff of counsel, for respondent.


Brian J. Davis, for appellant.

Suffolk County Traffic Prosecutor's Office, Justin W. Smiloff of counsel, for respondent.

PRESENT: TIMOTHY S. DRISCOLL, J.P., JERRY GARGUILO, ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, JJ.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Defendant was charged in a simplified traffic information with following too closely ( Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 [a] ), arising from a three-vehicle automobile accident. At the conclusion of the trial, the court found defendant guilty of following too closely.

Contrary to defendant's contention, the trooper had the authority to file the valid simplified traffic information under the facts presented here (cf. People v D'Andraia , 67 Misc 3d 130[A], 2020 NY Slip Op 50426[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2020]).

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

DRISCOLL, J.P., GARGUILO and EMERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Marino

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York, Second Dept., 9 & 10 Jud. Dist.
Apr 21, 2022
75 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2022)
Case details for

People v. Marino

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andrew MARINO…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York, Second Dept., 9 & 10 Jud. Dist.

Date published: Apr 21, 2022

Citations

75 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2022)
166 N.Y.S.3d 434

Citing Cases

People v. Alfaro

Contrary to defendant's contention, the police officer had the authority to file the simplified traffic…