From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 2004
7 A.D.3d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2001-11008.

Decided May 24, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), rendered November 29, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts) and robbery in the third degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Winston McIntosh of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Sholom J. Twersky, and Isaac S. Greaney of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions regarding alleged errors that were committed at trial are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Griffin, 246 A.D.2d 668; People v. Saladana, 208 A.D.2d 872). In any event, any alleged errors were harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt ( see People v. Johnson, 57 N.Y.2d 969; People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Marin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 2004
7 A.D.3d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Marin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. CARLOS MARIN, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 24, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
776 N.Y.S.2d 888

Citing Cases

Marin v. Cunningham

The Appellate Division rejected these claims as "unpreserved for appellate review" and also found that "[i]n…