From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marilyn

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth Appellate District.
Jul 30, 2003
H025419 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 30, 2003)

Opinion

H025419.

7-30-2003

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KATHLEEN MARILYN HOLLIMAN, Defendant and Appellant.


Defendant was convicted of two counts of grand theft (Pen. Code, §§ 484, 487), one count of theft and embezzlement from an elder (Pen. Code, § 368, subd. (d)), and one count of forgery (Pen Code, § 470, subd. (d)). She was sentenced to serve one year in county jail and filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief that states the case and the facts but raises no issues. Defendant was notified of her right to submit written argument on her own behalf. She has submitted a letter brief in which she raises issues occurring prior to entry of her plea of no contest. Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 158 Cal. Rptr. 839, 600 P.2d 1071, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there are no arguable issues on appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

WE CONCUR: Rushing, P.J., Wunderlich, J.


Summaries of

People v. Marilyn

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth Appellate District.
Jul 30, 2003
H025419 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 30, 2003)
Case details for

People v. Marilyn

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KATHLEEN MARILYN HOLLIMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Sixth Appellate District.

Date published: Jul 30, 2003

Citations

H025419 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 30, 2003)