Opinion
June 24, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We disagree with the defendant's contention that he was entitled to a charge of manslaughter in the second degree as a lesser-included offense. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant ( see, People v. Martin, 59 N.Y.2d 704), there is no reasonable view of the evidence that would have supported a charge of reckless manslaughter ( see, e.g., People v Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61; People v. Barden, 194 A.D.2d 548; People v Bloomfield, 187 A.D.2d 518; People v. Stanley, 185 A.D.2d 827).
We have considered the defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit. O'Brien, J.P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.