Opinion
1999-00327
Submitted March 19, 2002.
April 15, 2002.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered January 4, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Andrew C. Fine, New York, N.Y. (Jojo Annobil of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Amy Appelbaum, and Amy Yang of counsel), for respondent.
Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the trial court should have instructed the jury that evidence of guilt as to one criminal incident could not be considered evidence of guilt as to the other incident charged in the indictment (see People v. Robbins, 239 A.D.2d 526; see also People v. Davis, 195 A.D.2d 605; People v. Lewis, 175 A.D.2d 885; CPL 470.05).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
PRUDENTI, P.J., FEUERSTEIN, FRIEDMANN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.