From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mangan

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Butte
Jul 17, 2023
No. C097642 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 17, 2023)

Opinion

C097642

07-17-2023

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSHUA CHRISTOPHER MANGAN, Defendant and Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super. Ct. No. 21CF05637

HORST, J. [*]

Appointed counsel for defendant Joshua Christopher Mangan filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) After reviewing the entire record, we affirm the judgment.

We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

BACKGROUND

Defendant took a bicycle valued at $2,400 from a residential garage. Defendant pled no contest to first degree residential burglary without a non-accomplice present (Pen. Code, § 459) and stipulated that the court may derive aggravating factors from the probation report, police report, and any declarations. At sentencing on September 29, 2022, the trial court found several factors in aggravation, no factors in mitigation, and sentenced defendant to the upper term of six years.

Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal but did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.

DISCUSSION

Appointed counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and defendant has not filed a supplemental brief.

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: EARL, P. J. DUARTE, J.

[*] Judge of the Placer County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.


Summaries of

People v. Mangan

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Butte
Jul 17, 2023
No. C097642 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 17, 2023)
Case details for

People v. Mangan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSHUA CHRISTOPHER MANGAN…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District, Butte

Date published: Jul 17, 2023

Citations

No. C097642 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 17, 2023)