Opinion
November 30, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that an allegedly inflammatory comment by the prosecutor constituted reversible error has not been preserved for appellate review (see, People v. Hardwick, 122 A.D.2d 165; CPL 470.05), and in any event lacks merit (see, People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 399; People v. Arce, 42 N.Y.2d 179, 191; People v. Ashwal, 39 N.Y.2d 105, 109-110).
Similarly, the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim of error with regard to the trial court's charge on the definition of reasonable doubt by failing to object to that portion of the charge (see, People v. Fisher, 112 A.D.2d 378; CPL 470.05). In any event, the court's charge on the definition of reasonable doubt was complete and accurate (see, People v. Malloy, 55 N.Y.2d 296; People v. Quinones, 123 A.D.2d 793). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.