From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maldonado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 1993
199 A.D.2d 40 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 7, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.).


Defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea was properly denied, there being no showing that his decision to plead guilty was based on a misapprehension of fact (see, People v Reinoso, 188 A.D.2d 280, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 793), or was otherwise not knowing and voluntary (see, People v Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520). Defendant's claim that the court erred in not informing him of his right under CPL 380.50 to speak at sentencing is not preserved, such omission never having been brought to the court's attention (see, People v Green, 54 N.Y.2d 878). We decline to reach it in the interest of justice. If we were to reach the issue, we would find that there was substantial compliance with the statute (see, People v McClain, 35 N.Y.2d 483, 491, cert denied sub nom. Taylor v New York, 423 U.S. 852).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Maldonado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 1993
199 A.D.2d 40 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Maldonado

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FERNANDO MALDONADO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 40 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 857

Citing Cases

People v. Parmeter

We similarly reject defendant's argument that County Court erred in not affording her the opportunity to make…

People v. Diaz

Defendant also asserts that he was denied his right to address the court at sentencing because the court did…