From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maldonado

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Apr 1, 2015
127 A.D.3d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2014-05791.

04-01-2015

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Samuel MALDONADO, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (A. Alexander Donn of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (A. Alexander Donn of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Foley, J.), dated May 5, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant contends that, in determining his risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6–C), the Supreme Court improperly granted the People's application, upon the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, for an upward departure to risk level three. A court may exercise its discretion to upwardly depart from the presumptive risk level where “there exists an aggravating ... factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the guidelines” (Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006] ). The aggravating factor must be proven by clear and convincing evidence (see People v. Suber, 91 A.D.3d 619, 619–620, 935 N.Y.S.2d 898 ; People v. Wyatt, 89 A.D.3d 112, 123, 931 N.Y.S.2d 85 ).Here, the Supreme Court properly considered the brutal and severe nature of the defendant's conduct toward the complainant as an aggravating factor warranting an upward departure (see People v. Suber, 91 A.D.3d at 619–620, 935 N.Y.S.2d 898 ; People v. Rios, 57 A.D.3d 501, 502–503, 868 N.Y.S.2d 295 ). Accordingly, the defendant was properly adjudicated a level three sex offender.

SKELOS, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HINDS–RADIX and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Maldonado

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Apr 1, 2015
127 A.D.3d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Maldonado

Case Details

Full title:People of State of New York, respondent, v. Samuel Maldonado, appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Apr 1, 2015

Citations

127 A.D.3d 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
4 N.Y.S.3d 534
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 2739

Citing Cases

People v. Wilkerson

The defendant and the accomplice then captured the victim, forced her into a van at gunpoint, and engaged in…

People v. Wilkerson

The defendant and the accomplice then captured the victim, forced her into a van at gunpoint, and engaged in…