From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Maldonado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 48 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 4, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.).


Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The record supports the hearing court's finding that the stop of defendant's vehicle for an actual traffic violation was not pretextual. The frisk of the occupants was justified by their suspicious movements ( see, People v. Roth, 66 N.Y.2d 688). The officer's discovery of a gun in a passenger's waistband created probable cause to search the area under another passenger's seat, where the officer had seen that passenger attempt to place something ( see, People v. Ellis, 62 N.Y.2d 393).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Maldonado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 48 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Maldonado

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ABDON MALDONADO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 4, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 48 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 719

Citing Cases

People v. Muniz

The officers saw defendant leaning forward, fidgeting and moving his arms around in the truck, which had…

People v. Hanson

The initial stop of the vehicle for a traffic infraction based upon the officer's observations was lawful and…